Section 7520 Rate For July ‘10 Drops to 2.8%

For purposes of determining the present value of an annuity, an interest for life or a term of years, or a remainder or a reversionary interest, Revenue Ruling 2010-18 indicates the applicable federal rate under section 7520 for July 2010 is 2.8%; down 0.4% from the June rate of 3.2% and down 0.6% from the May rate of 3.4%.

State Tax Law Changes for 2010

The 2010 Washington State Legislature made a number of changes to taxes and programs administered by the Department of Revenue.  Here are three that may interest you:

CEO and CFO Strict Liability for tax debts. 2ESSB 6143 (Section 801) imposes strict liability on a CEO and CFO for collected but unremitted sales tax regardless of fault or whether or not they were aware of the unpaid tax liability. Effective May 1, 2010.

Economic Nexus. 2ESSB 6143 (Section 101) defines economic nexus standards. Out-of-state businesses that currently do not pay any Washington taxes may have nexus with the State of Washington and therefore have a tax reporting obligation. Effective June 1, 2010.

Director Fees. 2ESSB 6143 (Section 701) clarifies that amounts received by an individual from a corporation as director fees are subject to B&O tax. The bill also provides limited relief against the retroactive assessment of B&O tax on director’s fees.  Effective July 1, 2010.

To see a comprehensive list of changes to the state tax law, with links to each bill, visit the Department of Revenue’s website at dor.wa.gov/newlegislation.

IRS’s Six Things To About TEO’s Tax Treatment

Every year, millions of taxpayers donate money to charitable organizations. The IRS has put together the following list of six things you should know about the tax treatment of tax-exempt organizations:

  • Annual returns are made available to the public;
  • Donor lists generally are not public information;
  • How to find tax-exempt organizations;
  • Which organizations may accept charitable contributions;
  • How to find tax-exempt organizations;
  • Which organizations may accept charitable contributions;
  • Requirements for organizations not able to accept deductible contributions;
  • and

  • How to report inappropriate activities by an exempt organization.

ul>

For more information, click here to review IRS Tax Tip 2010-59

IRS Lists 2010 “Dirty Dozen” Tax Scams

On March 16th, the IRS issued its 2010 “dirty dozen” list of tax scams, including schemes involving return preparer fraud, hiding income offshore and phishing.

“Taxpayers should be wary of anyone peddling scams that seem too good to be true,” IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman said. “The IRS fights fraud by pursuing taxpayers who hide income abroad and by ensuring taxpayers get competent, ethical service from qualified professionals at home in the U.S.”

Tax schemes are illegal and can lead to imprisonment and fines for both scam artists and taxpayers. Taxpayers pulled into these schemes must repay unpaid taxes plus interest and penalties. The IRS pursues and shuts down promoters of these and numerous other scams.

The IRS urges taxpayers to avoid these common schemes:

Return Preparer Fraud

Dishonest return preparers can cause trouble for taxpayers who fall victim to their ploys. Such preparers derive financial gain by skimming a portion of their clients’ refunds, charging inflated fees for return preparation services and attracting new clients by promising refunds that are too good to be true. Taxpayers should choose carefully when hiring a tax preparer. Federal courts have issued injunctions ordering hundreds of individuals to cease preparing returns and promoting fraud, and the Department of Justice has filed complaints against dozens of others, which are pending in court.

To increase confidence in the tax system and improve compliance with the tax law, the IRS is implementing a number of steps for future filing seasons. These include a requirement that all paid tax return preparers register with the IRS and obtain a preparer tax identification number (PTIN), as well as both competency tests and ongoing continuing professional education for all paid tax return preparers except attorneys, certified public accountants (CPAs) and enrolled agents.

Setting higher standards for the tax preparer community will significantly enhance protections and services for taxpayers, increase confidence in the tax system and result in greater compliance with tax laws over the long term. Other measures the IRS anticipates taking are highlighted in the IRS Return Preparer Review issued in December 2009.

Hiding Income Offshore

The IRS aggressively pursues taxpayers involved in abusive offshore transactions as well as the promoters, professionals and others who facilitate or enable these schemes. Taxpayers have tried to avoid or evade U.S. income tax by hiding income in offshore banks, brokerage accounts or through the use of nominee entities. Taxpayers also evade taxes by using offshore debit cards, credit cards, wire transfers, foreign trusts, employee-leasing schemes, private annuities or insurance plans.

IRS agents continue to develop their investigations of these offshore tax avoidance transactions using information gained from over 14,700 voluntary disclosures received last year. While special civil-penalty provisions for those with undisclosed offshore accounts expired in 2009, the IRS continues to urge taxpayers with offshore accounts or entities to voluntarily come forward and resolve their tax matters. By making a voluntary disclosure, taxpayers may mitigate their risk of criminal prosecution.

Phishing

Phishing is a tactic used by scam artists to trick unsuspecting victims into revealing personal or financial information online. IRS impersonation schemes flourish during the filing season and can take the form of e-mails, tweets or phony Web sites. Scammers may also use phones and faxes to reach their victims.

Scam artists will try to mislead consumers by telling them they are entitled to a tax refund from the IRS and that they must reveal personal information to claim it. Criminals use the information they get to steal the victim’s identity, access bank accounts, run up credit card charges or apply for loans in the victim’s name.

Taxpayers who receive suspicious e-mails claiming to come from the IRS should not open any attachments or click on any of the links in the e-mail. Suspicious e-mails claiming to be from the IRS or Web addresses that do not begin with http://www.irs.gov should be forwarded to the IRS mailbox: phishing@irs.gov.

Filing False or Misleading Forms

The IRS is seeing various instances where scam artists file false or misleading returns to claim refunds that they are not entitled to. Under the scheme, taxpayers fabricate an information return and falsely claim the corresponding amount as withholding as a way to seek a tax refund. Phony information returns, such as a Form 1099-Original Issue Discount (OID), claiming false withholding credits usually are used to legitimize erroneous refund claims. One version of the scheme is based on a false theory that the federal government maintains secret accounts for its citizens, and that taxpayers can gain access to funds in those accounts by issuing 1099-OID forms to their creditors, including the IRS.

Nontaxable Social Security Benefits with Exaggerated Withholding Credit

The IRS has identified returns where taxpayers report nontaxable Social Security Benefits with excessive withholding. This tactic results in no income reported to the IRS on the tax return. Often both the withholding amount and the reported income are incorrect. Taxpayers should avoid making these mistakes. Filings of this type of return may result in a $5,000 penalty.

Abuse of Charitable Organizations and Deductions

The IRS continues to observe the misuse of tax-exempt organizations. Abuse includes arrangements to improperly shield income or assets from taxation and attempts by donors to maintain control over donated assets or income from donated property. The IRS also continues to investigate various schemes involving the donation of non-cash assets including situations where several organizations claim the full value for both the receipt and distribution of the same non-cash contribution. Often these donations are highly overvalued or the organization receiving the donation promises that the donor can repurchase the items later at a price set by the donor. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 imposed increased penalties for inaccurate appraisals and set new definitions of qualified appraisals and qualified appraisers for taxpayers claiming charitable contributions.

Frivolous Arguments

Promoters of frivolous schemes encourage people to make unreasonable and outlandish claims to avoid paying the taxes they owe. If a scheme seems too good to be true, it probably is. The IRS has a list of frivolous legal positions that taxpayers should avoid. These arguments are false and have been thrown out of court. While taxpayers have the right to contest their tax liabilities in court, no one has the right to disobey the law or IRS guidance.

Abusive Retirement Plans

The IRS continues to find abuses in retirement plan arrangements, including Roth Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs). The IRS is looking for transactions that taxpayers use to avoid the limits on contributions to IRAs, as well as transactions that are not properly reported as early distributions. Taxpayers should be wary of advisers who encourage them to shift appreciated assets at less than fair market value into IRAs or companies owned by their IRAs to circumvent annual contribution limits. Other variations have included the use of limited liability companies to engage in activity that is considered prohibited.

Disguised Corporate Ownership

Corporations and other entities are formed and operated in certain states for the purpose of disguising the ownership of the business or financial activity by means such as improperly using a third party to request an employer identification number.

Such entities can be used to facilitate underreporting of income, fictitious deductions, non-filing of tax returns, participating in listed transactions, money laundering, financial crimes and even terrorist financing. The IRS is working with state authorities to identify these entities and to bring the owners of these entities into compliance with the law.

Zero Wages

Filing a phony wage- or income-related information return to replace a legitimate information return has been used as an illegal method to lower the amount of taxes owed. Typically, a Form 4852 (Substitute Form W-2) or a “corrected” Form 1099 is used as a way to improperly reduce taxable income to zero. The taxpayer also may submit a statement rebutting wages and taxes reported by a payer to the IRS. Sometimes fraudsters even include an explanation on their Form 4852 that cites statutory language on the definition of wages or may include some reference to a paying company that refuses to issue a corrected Form W-2 for fear of IRS retaliation. Taxpayers should resist any temptation to participate in any of the variations of this scheme. Filings of this type of return may result in a $5,000 penalty.

Misuse of Trusts

For years, unscrupulous promoters have urged taxpayers to transfer assets into trusts. While there are many legitimate, valid uses of trusts in tax and estate planning, some promoted transactions promise reduction of income subject to tax, deductions for personal expenses and reduced estate or gift taxes. Such trusts rarely deliver the tax benefits promised and are used primarily as a means to avoid income tax liability and to hide assets from creditors, including the IRS.

The IRS has recently seen an increase in the improper use of private annuity trusts and foreign trusts to shift income and deduct personal expenses. As with other arrangements, taxpayers should seek the advice of a trusted professional before entering into a trust arrangement.

Fuel Tax Credit Scams

The IRS receives claims for the fuel tax credit that are excessive. Some taxpayers, such as farmers who use fuel for off-highway business purposes, may be eligible for the fuel tax credit. But other individuals are claiming the tax credit for nontaxable uses of fuel when their occupation or income level makes the claim unreasonable. Fraud involving the fuel tax credit is considered a frivolous tax claim and potentially subjects those who improperly claim the credit to a $5,000 penalty.

IRS Announces Qualified Disaster Treatment for Chile

The Internal Revenue Service on March 9, 2010 issued guidance designating the earthquake that occurred in Chile in February 2010 as a qualified disaster for federal tax purposes. The guidance allows individuals who receive qualified disaster relief payments from any person to exclude those payments from income on their tax returns. Also, the guidance allows employer-sponsored private foundations to assist employee-victims in areas affected by this earthquake without affecting their tax-exempt status.

Qualified disaster relief payments include amounts to cover necessary personal, family, living or funeral expenses that were not covered by insurance. They also include expenses to repair or rehabilitate personal residences or repair or replace the contents to the extent that they were not covered by insurance. Again, these payments would not be included in the individual recipient’s gross income.

Qualified disasters include Presidentially declared disasters and any other event that the Secretary of the Treasury determines to be of a catastrophic nature. The IRS has determined that the earthquake that occurred in Chile in February 2010 is an event of a catastrophic nature for purposes of the federal tax law.

The IRS will presume that disaster relief that a private foundation provides to employee-victims and their family members in areas affected by the earthquake in Chile are consistent with the foundation’s charitable purposes.

Attorney Urges Congress to Repeal Carryover Basis Rule

In response to congressional inaction regarding the estate tax prior to the end of 2009, attorney Conrad Teitell has written Senate Finance Committee leaders urging them to retroactively repeal another component of EGTRA, which imposes carryover basis rules on inheritances during 2010.

Subject: Estate Tax — First Bipartisan Step

Chairman Baucus and Ranking Member Grassley:

While there is a stalemate over the estate tax exemption and rates, I urge that now as a bipartisan act that the Congress repeal 2010’s modified carryover basis rules retroactively to January 1, 2010.

More about this soon, but first some background.At the Senate Finance Committee Estate Tax Revision hearing on November 14, 2007, I was the only estate-planning lawyer. The three other witnesses were a businessman from Iowa, a rancher from Nevada and an oracle from Omaha. They discussed whether or not there should be an estate tax and if so what the exemption and rate should be.

My charge as the estate-planning lawyer on the panel was to tell how I and my law firm have dealt and are dealing with the complexity of changing exemptions and rates since EGTRA’s enactment, estate-tax interruptus in 2010 (but with a gift tax and modified carryover basis) and the return of the estate tax in 2011 and beyond with a $1 million exemption and a 55% rate (60% for part of some larger estates). I told how we use formula clauses, disclaimers and contingency planning — and how complicated all this has become. Virtually every member of the Committee decried the complexity of the roller-coaster exemptions and the uncertainty it created for their constituents.

Current stalemate.

The Senate is now engaged in an estate-tax chess match with Red and Blue pieces (instead of the traditional Black and White ones). Unfortunately, your constituents are pawns in this game. You have already heard the hardships caused by the uncertainty of when the Congress will act, what it will enact and whether it will be retroactive.

Now for the Read and Blue Bipartisan Agreement on modified carryover basis.

Many of your constituents will have to pay capital gains taxes on their inheritances in 2010. This will punish those who transfer small businesses, farms, ranches and other assets.Many assets will have to be sold — and a tax incurred — to assure that funds will be available to pay the estate tax if it is reinstated (whether retroactively or prospectively). Prudent Investor laws require sales in many cases to provide diversification of an estate’s assets.

Apart from the foregoing, most wills (not anticipating that Congress would fail to act) have given no instructions to executors on how to allocate assets to avail beneficiaries of the $1.3 million step up for all heirs and the additional $3 million step up for assets bequeathed to a surviving spouse. The law is unclear on the procedure to be followed if the assets pass under a living trust, intestacy or for a surviving joint owner.

It is highly likely that when the Congress finally acts on the estate tax, it will repeal carryover basis. Chairman Baucus has said that estate tax legislation would be retroactive. What that legislation will be — as far as the exemption and rates — I can’t guess. But again, it seems virtually certain that carryover basis will be repealed.

So why not repeal carryover basis now (retroactively to January 1, 2010) while the Red and the Blue continue their chess match over the exemption and the rates.

In my travels around the country, Americans are still cheering for the Red, White and Blue. Why not take a first bipartisan step and repeal carryover basis and give them some reason to once again cheer the Red and the Blue.

This letter represents my personal views and does not represent the official view of my law firm or any organization to which I belong. No client has engaged me to make these comments to you.

Respectfully,

Conrad Teitell

Calendar

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Get in Touch

7350 Cirque Dr. W
Suite 201
University Place, WA 98467
(253) 284-8196
charlie@charliedent.com